I’d never thought of a hat as a non sequitur until I saw this ad in my local newspaper.
With this hat, though, you just never know what might follow.
Continue readingI’d never thought of a hat as a non sequitur until I saw this ad in my local newspaper.
With this hat, though, you just never know what might follow.
Continue reading“That” is a perfectly fine pronoun. Buildings are thats, and bats are thats and even “thats” are that. But, please, for the sake of humanity, let’s make people – including “anyone” – “who” or “whom.”
Here’s one way to think about it, à la Theodor Geisel:
Continue readingThis is about as basic as errors in usage get, but it (its?) pops up again and again in news stories, books, blogs and, as in this case, advertisements. Why?
Continue readingThe “first 100 … recieves”? My guess is that the creators of this ad were distracted by the picture of the large-breasted woman covered (snicker) by the strand of red
Continue readingThis is NOT A CHECK. It is shaped like a check. It is printed like a check. It has an amount like a check. It is signed like a check. But it is NOT A CHECK.
So what does one do with NOT A CHECK?